This is a long post, but please bear with me. I think you’ll find it worth the time it takes to read it. I’ve pasted a quote from the Wall Street Journal. At the end of it, I’m posting my comments.
Oil shale reserves can turn Israel into major world producer
From: The Times
March 21, 201111:54AM
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
THE JOKE has been told by generations of Jews, most famously Golda Meir, the former prime minister of Israel: ‘Why did Moses lead us to the one place in the Middle East without oil?’
But an updated version may be required if Harold Vinegar and his colleagues get their way. Dr Vinegar, the former chief scientist of Royal Dutch Shell, is at the centre of an ambitious project to turn Israel into one of the world’s leading oil producers.
Israel Energy Initiatives, where Dr Vinegar is chief scientist, is working on projects to extract oil and natural gas from oil shale from a 238sq km area of the Shfela Basin, to the south and west of Jerusalem.
Oil shale mining is often frowned upon, not least by the environmental lobby, as a dirty process that is both energy and water-intensive. IEI believes that its technique will be cleaner than that of other operators because the oil will be separated from the shale rock up to 300m beneath the ground. Water will be a by-product of the process rather than being consumed by it in large volumes.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
OIL FUTURES: 2pc spike
Oil states aim to hold prices Herald Sun, 1 day ago
Beach plans shale gas well by year-end Adelaide Now, 7 days ago
OPEC oil output takes a Libyan hit Adelaide Now, 4 Apr 2011
The good oil on Bakken barrels The Australian, 3 Apr 2011
Fallout from gulf disaster takes toll on BHP The Australian, 30 Mar 2011
End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
According to Dr Vinegar, Israel has the second-biggest oil shale deposits in the world, outside the US: “We estimate that there is the equivalent of 250 billion barrels of oil here. To put that in context, there are proven reserves of 260 billion barrels of oil in Saudi Arabia.”
The marginal cost of production, IEI estimates, will be between $US35 and $US40 per barrel. This, Dr Vinegar points out, is cheaper than the $US60 or so per barrel that it costs to extract crude from inhospitable locations such as the Arctic, and compares with $US30-$US40 per barrel in some of the deepwater oilfields off the coast of Brazil.
“These Israeli deposits have been known about, but have never been listed before. It was previously assumed there was not the technology to deal with it.”
According to Dr Vinegar, IEI, which is owned by the American telecoms group IDT Corp, hopes to begin production on a commercial basis by the end of the decade, with a view to producing 50,000 barrels per day at the outset. This would be a fraction of the 270,000bpd consumed daily by Israel, but would be a significant step towards making the country energy-independent.
Dr Vinegar estimates that, with one barrel of oil comprising 42 gallons, each tonne of oil shale contains approximately 25gallons.The extraction process involves heating the rock underground, using electric heaters, to approximately 325C, the level at which the carbon-carbon bonds in the rock start to “crack”. The oil produced by the process is light and easily refined to a range of products, including naphtha, jet fuel and diesel.
The project is attracting serious interest from outside investors. In November, 2010, an 11 per cent stake in Genie Oil & Gas, the division of IDC that is the parent company of IEI, was acquired for $US11m ($11.05m) by Jacob Rothschild, the banker, and Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corporation, parent company of The Times. Genie’s advisory board includes heavyweight figures such as Michael Steinhardt, the hedge fund investor, and Dick Cheney, the former US vice-president.
Dr Vinegar said that an appraisal now under way would be followed by an 18-month pilot stage. Among the issues this will address will be concerns raised by environmental groups, including an examination of IEI’s claims that the process does not require excessive use of water or energy. Reassurance will also be sought that a local aquifer, which is several hundred metres below the shale deposits, will not be contaminated by the work.
Assuming that these early stages are completed successfully, a demonstration phase would then take place over three to four years, during which the work completed in the pilot phase would be continued on a larger scale. Only then would the commercial operations begin. Dr Vinegar said that, by this stage, up to 1000 people would be employed on the project, many of them specialist engineers from outside Israel.
He added: “Funding is not needed for the pilot and demonstration, although once we were getting to 50,000 barrels per day, we would want to have a partner. We have been approached by all the majors.”
Dr Vinegar said that the project still faced a number of hurdles: “There is a geological risk: Is the resource there? What is the risk to the aquifer? We have no doubts here, and in particular that the resource is there and is of good quality, but the pilot can prove these things.
“Then there is the technological risk: Can we drill long horizontal wells and can the heaters be placed in them? And can they last?
“And finally there is the economic risk, what the price of oil does. But I think the price is going to continue rising, to the extent that, by 2030, we will be at around $US200 per barrel.”
To that, there can be added a fourth potential risk for the project: whether it is capable of overcoming criticism from the environmental lobby to win popular support. This, perhaps, is the greatest challenge facing Dr Vinegar and his colleagues.
What you’ve just read (if you’ve stayed with me), I believe is what will bring about the enforcement of the Oslo Accords (the peace treaty between Israel and Palestine). This was to have taken place in 1996, but Israel “goofed” and it never happened. All it would take is the President of the United States to confirm this peace treaty (which he has the power to do without Congressional support). The perfect timing for Obama to do this would be right before the 2012 elections. Since most people (including conservative evangelical Christians) would see this as a good thing, it would ensure his reelection! It would give the U.S. access to more inexpensive oil than we’ve ever dreamed possible and bring peace to the middle east stopping the threat of nuclear war. At the time that Obama confirms this treaty, the seven year tribulation would start. (Remember that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize–not for what he has done, but for what he WILL do.)
As Jack has been saying since the 1980’s, (perhaps even earlier), the President of the United States IS the antichrist and he’s on the scene right now. There are many other things that point to this and with a little digging, you can find them easily on-line (which is why our government is furiously trying to control the internet.
Jesus told us to watch…so that we are not taken unawares. No one, other than God’s own people, are going to tell you these things, or put them all together. Each bit of information is a puzzle peice. When it’s all put together Spirit-filled Christians will see easily what is happening. Those that can’t see are not spirit filled and are being deluded.